As Gaddafi forces move out of towns and cities across Libya, the media are moving in. For the first time we are seeing the extent of the regimes apparatus of torture, and it's victims, as this report from Al-Jazeera shows:
You are viewing my old blog, visit my shiny new one - News Ninja!
As Gaddafi forces move out of towns and cities across Libya, the media are moving in. For the first time we are seeing the extent of the regimes apparatus of torture, and it's victims, as this report from Al-Jazeera shows:
Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, the German Defence minister has resigned after a scandal involving his PhD thesis.
The German aristocrat was found to have copied large sections of text from sources without attribution, including newspapers and a US government website.
After a backlash from the academic community, which led to a wider campaign in Germany, Guttenberg has finally stood down, stating that he was the minister for defence, not self defence.
Guttenberg is not however the only politician to be facing charges of plagiarism. Saif Gaddafi, son of Libya's beguiled leader Colonel Gaddafi and widely seen as his heir and right hand man, is caught up in a similar scandal.
Saif Gaddafi studied at the London School of Economics from 2003 - 2008, earning a masters degree and a doctorate. The LSE is investigating allegations that he plagiarised, or rather his ghost writer plagiarised, large sections of his thesis.
The institution received £300,000 from the Gaddafi regime and is under pressure to give this money to charity, and to revoke Saif Gaddafi's doctorate.
Last week Saif was questioned on whether he and his father would leave Libya. His response was:
"There are three plans, plan A, plan B, and plan C. Plan A is to live and die in Libya. Plan B is to live and die in Libya. Plan C is to live and die in Libya."
I see he hasn't forgotten how to copy and paste.
If you would like to help humiliate Saif Gaddafi, check out the Saif Al-Islam Gaddafi Thesis Wiki, where you can collaborate on finding evidence of plagiarism in the thesis.
Some commentators have drawn a parallel to Libya of the situation in Bosnia and later Kosovo in the 90's. There are similarities: an autocratic leader slaughtering his own people, use of the armed forces to carry out these atrocities, potential for the crisis to affect other states in the region.
There are however major differences. Firstly the Gaddafi regime doesn't have the kind of popular support that Milosovic enjoyed. Every day that passes sees his power base crumble still further as diplomats defect, the armed services switch to the side of the rebels, and more and more towns and cities become stable under opposition control.
Gaddafi now has a firm hold over only parts of Tripoli. Certainly he still has the support of a substantial part of his military, but as the crisis progresses there will be more defections, which will act as a vicious circle of waning support for the regime.
The deployment of foreign troops onto Libyan soil would likely make the situation worse, vindicating Gaddafi and his statements on the intents of foreign parties. This would without doubt stabilise the tyrants support at least.
Worse still military intervention could force the Gaddafi regime into deploying chemical weapons against his own people, or the peacekeeping troops.
Of course, if he does possess these weapons there is a risk that Gaddafi would use these weapons even without UN intervention - but as we saw with Libyan pilots flying to Malta, or ejecting instead of carrying out bombings against civilians, giving an order does not mean it will be executed. If Gaddafi did order his military to commit genocide I believe it would be the final straw in his own demise.
The UN must prepare and make itself ready, and do so quickly - Gaddafi is nothing if not unpredictable - but for now it must be calm and patient, and give this abominable regime a chance to destroy itself.
Colonel Gaddafi has said that he will not leave Libya, and will die a martyr.
During his defiant, rambling speech he tried to stir Libyans into reacting against the protesters. He used rhetoric about defying and defeating America, Britain and NATO.
He suggested that the young people of Libya were trying to emulate the people of Tunisia and Egypt, which he conceded.
He then went on to say that these young people - which he referred to as "cockroaches" - had been given drink, drugs and arms by unspecified groups and this was the cause of their actions.
He went on to say that if he had been a president he would have resigned, but as he was not he couldn't.
He said that he had already resolved the issue of power in Libya, saying the country was managed by the people via people's committees, which he suggested he may try to reform.
Gaddafi said that from tomorrow security should be restored by the police and the military. He also urged Libyans to "chase away" and "destroy" the protesters.
He continued by saying that if order wasn't restored then America would occupy Libya, and went on to discuss US engagement in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The tone of his speech was defiant and did not sound like a leader that was about to step down.
Reuters are reporting that Gaddafi has lost control of the Eastern regions of Libya, including Benghazi and the border with Egypt, which is now controlled by anti-Gaddafi forces, some of them wearing military uniforms.